In my post yesterday, I wrote about the slow economic recovery taking place and the need for the economy to achieve some structural reforms for economic growth to return to a level more consistent with that achieved over the past fifty years or so: a 3.2 percent year-over-year rate of growth.
I argued that one of the
economic sectors in need of a major restructuring was the state and local
government sector. Well, this post has
been followed by several reports in major newspapers concerning the problems
that specifically plague the states. For
example, the New York Times had a front page article on Wednesday morning while the Financial Times
contained a similar report.
The Financial Times summed up
the news: “US state governments are in desperate need of reform to solve
structural challenges that extend well beyond the cyclical woes of the
financial crisis and the recession, including $4 trillion in unfunded pension
and healthcare liabilities.”
The difficulties of state
governments have grown as the economy slowed and failed to strongly rebound
although some states have recently experienced rising revenues. However, people are being cautioned about
becoming too optimistic that the worst is over.
In addition, local
governments, as we know given the recent municipal bankruptcies, are also
facing continued dark times. Local
governments depend upon property taxes for about 74 percent of their revenue. These
governments have been starving over the past couple of years as the “middle
class piggybank”…home prices…have fallen.
And, although there appears to be some leveling out of housing prices,
any major recovery of property prices seems somewhere out in the future.
Furthermore, given the fiscal
problems in Washington, D. C., there has been talk of removing the tax
exemption of municipal bonds. This
possibility of this occurring could certainly cause uncertainty to rise about
what yields investors might receive on their investments in “munis”.
States and local governments,
although most of them have some kind of “balanced budget” constraint placed
upon them, have run deficits for years and years. Residents of these areas have constantly
demanded more and more services, education, health, prisons, courts, and other
agencies as the middle class has grown and as the middle class “piggy
bank”…home prices…have been able to underwrite the increases.
Furthermore, there has been
another factor at work as well, swelling state and local government budgets. Public unions have grown from a relatively
insignificant part of the labor movement to the point where, at present, more
than 50 percent of all unionized workers are employed by the government. State and local governments have been able to
pad their payrolls, increase salaries and wages, raise health and pension
benefits, and create better and better working conditions during the past fifty
years as credit inflation and housing price bubbles have inflated the revenues
of these governments.
Still, the revenue increases
have not kept up with all of these expenses.
As a consequence, state and local governments went to the well…they
found out how to use “create accounting” techniques. This is why these state governments find
themselves with $3 trillion of unfunded pension plans and $1 trillion of
unfunded health care plans.
And these states must take
care of building the new infrastructure of America, of providing a new health
care program for America, and of dealing with cries for better schools, a better
social net, and a fully staffed organization.
In addition, this whole state
and local government mess is going to get caught up in the next “big” fight
about the existence of labor unions!
The health of the labor
unions is tenuous. “The number of workers
who belong to a union has plummeted about 20 percent over the last decade. Only 8 percent of all workers are unionized.” This from a recent New
York Times article, which discusses the future of unions.
Unions in the private sector
have declined dramatically over the past forty years, and, the only real source
of strength in the union movement has been in the public sector. But, now with the sour economy and with a
depressed housing market, government budgets are being stretched to the limit
and the “creative accounting” is coming back to haunt the state and local
governments. The resolution of these
difficulties is not going to take place in the near term and this will lead to
more and more fights between governments and public labor unions.
Evidence of this was seen in
the tussle that recently went on in Wisconsin between pro-union supporters and Wisconsin
Governor Scott Walker. Furthermore, as the New York Times article states
“nonunion workers tend to resent rather than applaud the better pay and
benefits of their unionized brethren,” adding to the pressure against unions
trying to achieve their goals.
But, there will be a fight in
the public sector because public sector unions grew up on little resistance
from public sector officials. This was
because the public sector officials could always tap into, without much complaint,
the rising value of property values and pass-off these rising costs. If not that, then there was always the deep
pockets found in Washington, D. C. Now,
however, the “free lunch” is over.
So, expect a lot of turmoil
in state and local governments over the next five years or so. Budget realities are setting in at all
levels. Pensions cannot go unfunded indefinitely. Health care costs cannot go unfunded
indefinitely. And, public sector jobs
need to be filed in order to cover ordinary, day-by-day operation.
Moreover, the federal
government is looking for ways to tap into more revenues, like taxes on
municipal bonds, or more cuts in expenses, like less funding of state prisons
along with their call for more state and local participation in health care and
law enforcement.
There are massive structural
problems that must be dealt with in the United States. Correcting these structural problems is a
part of what must be done to help get the US economy growing at a more rapid
pace. At the end of this time, it is likely that labor unions in general, and
more, specifically, public labor unions, will be an even weaker part of the
United States economic scene than they are now.
No comments:
Post a Comment