“Fears that policy makers will again fail to come up with a credible solution to problems in the eurozone at an EU summit this week continue to affect market sentiment and weigh on the borrowing costs of other peripheral eurozone countries, including Italy.”
Confidence in European decision makers continues to slide in
financial markets.
Spain's
Treasury sold €3.08bn of short-term debt on Tuesday. Interest rates were substantially higher: The
Treasury auctioned three-month bills at an average rate of 2.362 per cent,
compared with 0.846 per cent at the previous sale last month, and six-month
bills at an average 3.237 per cent, up from 1.737 per cent.
Italy
also is caught in this market concern: Italy sold on Tuesday €3.9bn of
zero-coupon and inflation linked bonds near the top end of the range. It paid
4.712 per cent to sell two-year paper – the highest since December.
Confidence
is nowhere is sight.
Also,
in Italy, Prime Minister Mario Monte is attempting to get legislation
passed that would provide some reform for Italian labor markets. Yet, even though the bill may be passed, no
one seems at all happy with the contents of the reforms.
And,
analysts argue that the bill falls fall short: “The labor reform is inadequate
because it does not address shortcomings in the labor market that stifle the
economy,” writes Roger Abravanel, a former management consultant.
Still
some officials continue to talk about a eurozone
finance minister and a joint banking union.
Yet national interest and the desire to control a nation’s independent
fiscal policy and banking system make such talk seem far from reality.
Some
believe that this is evidenced by the fact that Germany and its Chancellor
Angela Merkel have not fully let on what path they ultimately want to
follow. Germany,
the creditor nation, “is acting as creditors always do. It wants to be paid
back or put debtors through default proceeding to extract maximum benefits.”
Germany,
it is argued, can ultimately achieve its goals by one of three paths:
deflation, inflation, and writing checks.
“Deflation
in the periphery would eventually make it competitive, and is Germany’s favored
option. But, as we are seeing, it
naturally leads to default by weaker banks and governments.”
With
inflation, Germany loses because it gets paid back in cheaper euros.
By
writing checks, Germany would pay off the periphery for leading an
undisciplined life. Another case of
moral hazard.
To
others, Germany has made a decision.
They have opted for the first of the three…European deflation. The idea here is that the deflation would
become so painful to the periphery nations that they would finally move to
correct their situation.
But,
as the quote above mentions, this would lead these nations to recognize their
insolvency and the insolvency of their banking systems in their any solution
they arrive at.
Do
you think this might win any friends for the Germans?
Still,
it seems at this time that Germany holds the cards. Post-war Europe has been
built on the premise that governments would always intervene in the economy to
insure that workers would be employed as fully as possible and that economies
would grow as fast as they could. The
result of this policy approach is the situation Europe now finds itself
in.
Germany
may be trying to say that this post-war European model no longer works.
But,
how much pain is Europe…and Germany…willing to go through to shift policy
paradigms?
No comments:
Post a Comment